“Individual copies of the following letter were delivered to the offices of Senators Warner and Webb on October 30, 2009:

“Tarbutton, of Fincastle, is a board member of the Roanoke Tea Party.

President Obama and the congressional leadership in Washington have a really sweet deal working. They have passed unprecedented spending bills in 2009, with the cornerstone being the various stimulus/buyouts that occurred late in President Bush’s term, then were accelerated madly over the past few months. We have been told by leaders in Washington that without this spending the nation’s economy will collapse due to the mess created by the Bush administration. Based on this paradigm, any failures are Bush’s fault, any successes are attributed to government spending. What a great way to never be accountable for anything. We all need a deal like that in our business and personal life.

It’s always convenient to blame errors at work on the last guy who left the company. I think we’ve all seen that. And it often works, since sometimes the last guy out left because he wasn’t doing a good job. Bush’s last two budgets were loaded with pork and spending and TARP was a train wreck. He certainly has some accountability for the current mess.”

Click Hereto read the rest of his article.

    Since the Internet took root as a mass communications phenomenon in the mid 1990s, a quiet war has raged in Washington over the extent to which the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would regulate the new medium.

Until, now the Internet has been largely self-regulated, and the FCC has taken a hands-off approach.

But that could change dramatically soon if the Obama administration has its way.

During the weekend, press reports revealed a stunning development: The Obama administration will announce Monday that the FCC would propose new rules to embrace what it calls “Net Neutrality.”

Obama’s new Federal Communications Commission chairman, Julius Genachowski, will use a speech to the Brookings Institution, a liberal think tank, to announce the FCC proposals, according to those reports.

On the face of it, Net Neutrality appears to be a popular and fair proposal.

Genachowski will “propose new rules that would prohibit Internet service providers from interfering with the free flow of information and certain applications over their networks,” according to the Associated Press.

The FCC rules “would bar Internet service providers such as Verizon Communications Inc., Comcast Corp. or AT&T Inc., from slowing or blocking certain services or content flowing through their vast networks,” according to the AP.

But critics contend that the proposals are nothing more than a backdoor way for the FCC to tighten federal control over the Internet by beginning with the regulation of Internet service providers.

The battle lines over Net Neutrality have formed along partisan and ideological lines, with some exceptions.

During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would embrace Net Neutrality � a cause championed by Google and other Silicon Valley companies that don’t want large Internet service providers denying or controlling their access to Internet users.

But Republicans have largely opposed Net Neutrality, suggesting self regulation has worked well.

The previous FCC chairman, Bush appointee Kevin Martin opposed Net Neutrality. He suggested it was not needed.

Conservatives see Net Neutrality as a power grab that will benefit big Internet players such as Amazon and Google while stifling smaller competitors.

The libertarian CATO Institute, in a 2004 policy analysis concluded: “The regulatory regime envisioned by Net Neutrality mandates would also open the door to a great deal of potential ‘gaming’ of the regulatory system and allow firms to use the regulatory system to hobble competitors. Worse yet, it would encourage more FCC regulation of the Internet and broadband markets in general.”

Democrats in Congress have pushed for such controls in the past without success. In 2006 House Democrats offered an amendment to make Net Neutrality law, but the motion failed.

At the time Republicans warned of efforts to control the Internet.

“I want a vibrant Internet just like they do,” Rep. Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican, said during the 2006 House debate over the issue. “Our disagreement is about how to achieve that. They say let the government dictate it . . . I urge my colleagues to reject government regulation of the Internet.”  

By: John O. Edwards

WE THE PEOPLE!

PRAYER… AMERICA’S HOPE!
Let your voice be heard!

Contact Email: franklincountyteaparty@gmail.com